A Brief and Incomplete Summary of 2012 Higgs Physics at the Large Hadron Collider

In preparation for the upcoming Moriond Conferences in Italy, I summarize the state of what was known about the new 125 GeV state in 2012. We all expect ATLAS and CMS to have more to say once the Moriond Conferences arrive, so think of this as a VERY brief primer on what was known about the new state as of December, 2012 – the last time public results were circulated by the two collaborations.

The Discovery of a Higgs-Like Boson at the LHC

The discovery of a boson whose properties are so far consistent with the Standard Model (SM) Higgs Boson marks an incredible achievement for the Standard Model. The boson has a mass that is about 125 GeV, and has been measured with precision in two channels by both the ATLAS and CMS collaborations. The precision channels available so far for measuring Higgs properties such as mass, spin, and the CP quantum numbers are H^0 \to Z Z^* and H^0 \to \gamma \gamma. The masses measured by the two collaborations in each of the two channels are reported to be [1][2][3]:

ATLAS:

(1)   \begin{eqnarray*} m_H(H^0 \to Z Z^*) & = & 123.5 \pm 0.8 (\mathrm{stat.}) \pm 0.3 (\mathrm{syst.}) \mathrm{GeV} \\ m_H( H^0 \to \gamma \gamma ) & = & 126.6 \pm 0.3 (\mathrm{stat.}) \pm 0.7 (\mathrm{syst.}) \mathrm{GeV}\\ \end{eqnarray*}

CMS:

(2)   \begin{eqnarray*} m_H(H^0 \to Z Z^*) & = & 126.2 \pm 0.6 (\mathrm{stat.}) \pm 0.2 (\mathrm{syst.}) \mathrm{GeV}\\ \end{eqnarray*}

CMS does not report a mass measurement alone in the H^0 \to \gamma \gamma channel, but instead combines the two high-mass channels into a single mass result. The ATLAS and CMS masses reported by combining the high-resolution channels are [4][5]:

ATLAS:

(3)   \begin{eqnarray*} m_H & = & 125.2 \pm 0.3 (\mathrm{stat.}) \pm 0.6 (\mathrm{syst.}) \mathrm{GeV}\\ \end{eqnarray*}

CMS:

(4)   \begin{eqnarray*} m_H & = & 125.8 \pm 0.4 (\mathrm{stat.}) \pm 0.4 (\mathrm{syst.}) \mathrm{GeV}\\ \end{eqnarray*}

The figures below illustrate the scans of signal strength (observed signal relative to SM expectation) vs. mass, including the 1-sigma contours for each high mass-resolution channel and their combination.

ATLAS Higgs mass combination plot. From ATLAS-CONF-2012-170.
ATLAS Higgs mass combination plot. From ATLAS-CONF-2012-170.
CMS Higgs mass combination plot. From CMS-HIG-12-045.
CMS Higgs mass combination plot. From CMS-HIG-12-045.

The two collaborations have used many channels overall to both discover the new boson and measure its properties. So far, the reported channels have been H^0 \to Z Z^*, \, \gamma \gamma, \, W^+W^-, \, b {\bar b}, \, \mathrm{and} \, \tau^+ \tau^-. The latter three channels have been more statistically challenging due to confounding factors of experimental mass resolution, background subtraction, and selection efficiency. However, both collaborations continue to demonstrate cycles of improvement in these issues with each newly unveiled result.

Overall, the results from these channels have been largely consistent with the expectation from the SM. Causing the most conversation in the community, the \gamma \gamma channel reported by both experiments has shown a consistent excess above the SM expectation. Whether this apparent excess will continue to remain with improvement in available data, experimental methods, and theoretical calculations, is to be seen. Significant excesses necessary to claim independent observation in the W^+W^-, \, b {\bar b}, \, \mathrm{and} \, \tau^+ \tau^- channels are still not announced.

ATLAS Collaboration results in all search channels. From ATLAS-CONF-2012-170.
ATLAS Collaboration results in all search channels. From ATLAS-CONF-2012-170.
CMS Collaboration results in all search channels. From CMS-PAS-HIG-12-045.
CMS Collaboration results in all search channels. From CMS-PAS-HIG-12-045.

The spin of the new boson is another property that is accessible through the detailed study of the channels with significant excesses (Z Z^*, \, \gamma \gamma). The observation of the new particle decaying at all to these final states establishes its nature as a boson; it it not possible to achieve the observed final states unless the spin of the parent is an integer. Due to its decay into the Z Z^* final state, and given the configurations of Z boson spin allowed in the decay, it’s possible that the boson is spin-0, 1, or 2. Due to its decay into the \gamma \gamma final state and the allowed polarizations of the final-state photons, the spin of the parent could be either spin-0 or 2. Since there is some tension in the values of the mass measurements from these two final states from both collaborations (albeit in opposite directions!), it is possible that both experiments have discovered a pair of bosons that are close in mass; one of those bosons could be spin-0, 1, or 2 and decays primarily to Z Z^* while the other is either spin-0 or 2 and decays primarily to \gamma \gamma. Absent observations of the angular distributions of final-state particles (leptons from the Z bosons, or the final-state photons in the \gamma \gamma channel), one cannot determine the actual spin of the parent for either of these hypotheses (the 1-parent hypothesis, or the 2-parent hypothesis).

ATLAS and CMS have reported on some of the angular distributions of the final-state particles in these decays. Both collaborations test Spin-CP (J^{CP}) hypotheses against one another to determine which is more probably given the data. CMS has tested the 0+ hypothesis against the 0- hypothesis; ATLAS has tested the 0+ hypothesis against 0-, 2+<sub>m</sub>, and 2- hypotheses [5] in the 4-lepton final state. Both experiments only have reported their measurements as comparisons of 0+ to any of the other spin hypotheses, employing the prediction that the SM Higgs Boson will have a 0+ spin-CP configuration. However, so far neither collaboration has reported tests of 0+ against 1+ or 1-, leaving open the possibility that they have found two new bosons each with different J^{CP} quantum numbers. They have also not compared all other possible combination of spin-CP hypothesis against one another.

Of the hypothesis tests that have been conducted, the new boson(s) are most consistent with the 0+ hypothesis.

From ATLAS-CONF-2012-169, "Distributions of the log-likelihood ratio generated with more than 50,000 Monte Carlo pseudo-experiments when assuming the spin 0+ hypothesis and testing the 0- . . . [hypothesis]. In each experiment the expected number of signal and background events is fixed to the observed yields. The data are indicated by the solid vertical lines, and the median of each of the expected distributions is indicated by a dashed line. The shaded areas correspond to the observed pval-values, representing the compatibility with the tested hypothesis H1 (right shaded area) and the assumed hypothesis H0 (left shaded area)."
From ATLAS-CONF-2012-169, “Distributions of the log-likelihood ratio generated with more than 50,000 Monte Carlo pseudo-experiments when assuming the spin 0+ hypothesis and testing the 0- . . . [hypothesis]. In each experiment the expected number of signal and background events is fixed to the observed yields. The data are indicated by the solid vertical lines, and the median of each of the expected distributions is indicated by a dashed line. The shaded areas correspond to the observed pval-values, representing the compatibility with the tested hypothesis H1 (right shaded area) and the assumed hypothesis H0 (left shaded area).”
The distribution of the test-statistic, q = -2ln(L-/L+), where L- is the likelihood that the data are from a true JCP=0- particle and L+ is the likelihood that the data are from a true JCP=0+. One distribution of q is generate using pseudoexperiments where JCP=0- and the other distribution is generated using pseudoexperiments where JCP=0+. The data are more consistent with the SM 0+ hypothesis. From CMS-PAS-HIG-12-045.
“The distribution of the test-statistic, q = -2ln(L-/L+), where L- is the likelihood that the data are from a true JCP=0- particle and L+ is the likelihood that the data are from a true JCP=0+. One distribution of q is generate using pseudoexperiments where JCP=0- and the other distribution is generated using pseudoexperiments where JCP=0+. The data are more consistent with the SM 0+ hypothesis.” From CMS-PAS-HIG-12-045.

[1] The ATLAS Collaboration. “An update of combined measurements of the new Higgs-like boson with high mass resolution channels.” ATLAS-CONF-2012-170. http://cds.cern.ch/record/1499629

[2] The CMS Collaboration. “Updated results on the new boson discovered in the search for the standard model Higgs boson in the ZZ to 4 leptons channel in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV.” CMS-PAS-HIG-12-041. http://cds.cern.ch/record/1494488?ln=en
[3] The ATLAS Collaboration. “Observation and study of the Higgs boson candidate in the two photon decay channel with the ATLAS detector at the LHC.” ATLAS-CONF-2012-168. http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1499625
[4] The ATLAS Collaboration. “An update of combined measurements of the new Higgs-like boson with high mass resolution channels.” ATLAS-CONF-2012-170. http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1499629
[5] The ATLAS Collaboration. “Updated results and measurements of properties of the new Higgs-like particle in the four lepton decay channel with the ATLAS detector”. ATLAS-CONF-2012-169. http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1499628
[6] The CMS Collaboration. “Combination of standard model Higgs boson searches and measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 GeV.” CMS-PAS-HIG-12-045. http://cds.cern.ch/record/1494149?ln=en

Six Months Later

[Originally posted at the SMU at CERN blog: http://blog.smu.edu/smucern/]

It’s been a while since any of us in the SMU ATLAS group have posted. It’s been a busy six months since the announcement of a new particle discovered by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at the Large Hadron Collider. In those six months, and incredible amount of effort has poured into many directions regarding the new particle. We’ve been searching for other ways in which this new particle might decay. We’ve been looking for cousins of this new particle that might, should they exist, teach us more about the greater theory of nature that encompasses the Standard Model and explains more than the Standard Model.

One of the most difficult efforts has gone into trying to measure one of  the new particle’s trickier properties: its quantum numbers.

There is an excellent explanation of one of those quantum numbers, “spin,” given by our post-doctoral researcher, Aidan Randle-Conde, over at his LHC blog:

http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2012/07/16/spinning-out-of-control/ (“Spinning out of control!”)

The SMU group has been involved in all of these, and as more and more of the work we’re involved in becomes public we’ll discuss more what is going on, what we are learning, and where the work will lead us next.