Peer review is the basis of good science publication standards. Papers are sent to journals and the journal collects a group of experts in the field so that the material can be reviewed. A positive review of the work lends itself toward obtaining publication; a negative review, depeding on the severity, can mean the paper is sent back to the authors for reconsideration or that it is not considered at all for publication.
Teaching this good practice of science is important, and what better time to start than when they people are young. Educating young scientists on the power of peer review can be a harsh lesson, “as illustrated by this article in a reputable newspaper”:http://www.theonion.com/news/index.php?issue=4116&n=3.
Sometimes the truth about your hypothesis can hurt. I wonder if the pushers of “intelligent design” can learn a thing or two from these brave kids. At least these young scientists tried to get their work reviewed for publication. Time to pony up actual predictions, ID’ers.
