A beautiful press release from NASA just appeared which concisely and directly summarizes the analysis of global temperature since 1880 using three data sources. Find the article here: http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/temp-analysis-2009.html. I particularly like that they make a clear distinction between short-term local effects (El Nino, La Nina), short-term cyclic effects (solar irradiance), and long term global trends (temperature increases). It’s those short-term local or cyclic effects that most global climate change deniers like to use to cheat the public out of an understanding of the long-term effects. The NASA article quickly makes the distinction and nicely illustrates how those effects are accounted for.
AUTHOR
You may also like
On the recent SLAC/Fermilab/U.S. LHC trip to Washington D.C., a challenge was put to us: high-energy physics, as a field, needs […]
There is more to discuss about “Climate-gate.” There is the release of e-mails from the scientists. There are the choices scientists make […]
At breakfast today, a friend of mine informed me that Obama had finally responded to the 14 science policy questions sent to […]
This was quite a week. It began with the long Easter weekend here in the UK, which came to an exceptional end […]